Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Mistral Small 4

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna vs Mistral Small 4 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.6 Luna

openai · gpt-5.6-luna

Input
$0.2
Output
$1.2
Context
1.1M

Mistral Small 4

mistral · mistral/mistral-small-2603

Input
$0.15
Output
$0.6
Context
256K

Quick take

Mistral Small 4 has the lower input price at $0.15 per 1M input tokens. Mistral Small 4 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if...

  • GPT-5.6 Luna is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-5.6 Luna gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Mistral Small 4 if...

  • Mistral Small 4 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.6 Luna Mistral Small 4 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $0.44 $0.27 Mistral Small 4
10M input + 2M output $4.40 $2.70 Mistral Small 4
100M input + 20M output $44.00 $27.00 Mistral Small 4

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.6 Luna provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.6 Luna max output
128K
Mistral Small 4 max output
n/a
GPT-5.6 Luna features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Mistral Small 4 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.6 Luna

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Risk notes for Mistral Small 4

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierbudgetfastreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragopen-weightenterpriselocal-open

Related comparisons