Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok Build 0.1

Compare GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok Build 0.1 API pricing: input/output token costs, cache pricing, context windows, workload estimates, and routing fit.

GPT-5.6 Sol

openai · gpt-5.6-sol

Input
$4
Output
$20
Context
1.1M

Grok Build 0.1

xai · grok-build-0.1

Input
$1
Output
$2
Context
256K

Quick take

Grok Build 0.1 has the lower input price at $1 per 1M input tokens. Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper for the example blended workload below. GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window at 1.1M tokens.

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if...

  • GPT-5.6 Sol is safer for long documents, repository analysis, and RAG prompts because it has the larger context window.
  • GPT-5.6 Sol gives more room for long generated answers, reports, or code output.

Choose Grok Build 0.1 if...

  • Grok Build 0.1 is the better default for cost-sensitive traffic and repeated high-volume calls.

Example workload cost

Estimates use input tokens plus 20% output tokens. They exclude provider discounts, cache hits, and tool/search surcharges.

Workload GPT-5.6 Sol Grok Build 0.1 Cheaper
1M input + 200K output $8.00 $1.40 Grok Build 0.1
10M input + 2M output $80.00 $14.00 Grok Build 0.1
100M input + 20M output $800.00 $140.00 Grok Build 0.1

Context, output, and capability fit

GPT-5.6 Sol provides the larger context window. Check max output separately when the task needs long reports, code generation, or full-document rewrites.

GPT-5.6 Sol max output
128K
Grok Build 0.1 max output
n/a
GPT-5.6 Sol features
prompt caching, function calling, vision
Grok Build 0.1 features
prompt caching, function calling, vision

Risk notes for GPT-5.6 Sol

  • High output price: cap max tokens for verbose generation workloads.

Risk notes for Grok Build 0.1

  • No major capability risk is flagged in this snapshot, but provider pages should still be verified before production routing.

Routing tags

frontierpremiumreasoningcodingagentslong-contextmultimodalcache-friendlyragbudget

Related comparisons